Ethical Issues in Management Paper free essay sample

Ethical Issues in Management Managers have many tasks to complete each day as well as many responsibilities that they need to have under control. The process of hiring is an extremely difficult task. It being one of the most important roles and responsibilities of holding a managers position. Throughout the process of hiring, a management representative looks for unique individuals that hold the qualifications to do the job in which they are applying for. This is always an important part in finding the proper person to support the company’s visions, values, and morals. Management must be very careful concerning this delicate process. Avoiding any type of actions, comments, or decisions that could be unethical to stay away from legal issues. All organizations need assurance that they are following all employment regulations that have been set by the government to keep them safe from any trouble that could come from a bad interview. Moral and Ethical Issues Many moral and ethical issues can come up when management has to deal with the hiring new employees process. One issue a manager must face when considering a prospective employee is nepotism. According to Dictionary. com (2010), â€Å"patronage bestowed or favoritism shown on the basis of family relationship, as in business and politics† (Nepotism, para. 1). This usually could affect a business or company is a negative light. If there is a very competitive position that just opened up, say in a law firm and the word got out, many people would of course, apply for this position immediately. These people are extremely interested in this position, and are curious why they have not gotten a callback. It is unfair to the innocent patrons who believe they have a shot at the position when they clearly have no idea that a family member or friend was put before them simply because he or she know the one who is doing the hiring. A nepotism-type conflict could arise easily if the manager used his or her power of authority to influence the hiring process of a relative or friend. Many steps can be practiced by a person of higher authority when it comes to voiding or resolving any issues of nepotism. Some of these steps include: reviewing the company’s policies on or about nepotism, being sure to enforce these policies so that an unethical predicament will not occur. Working with the human resources department to resolve any issues that are currently present is another great way to try to cut out rumors that may come about. Allowing rumors to thrive and encouraging unjustifie d views of nepotism could impact an organization in a negative manner. According to EmployeeIssues. om (2003-2010), â€Å"The consequences of nepotism might constitute illegal employment discrimination under Federal discrimination laws or state equivalents, in either the private or public sector. For example, it might constitute illegal discrimination on the basis of race or sex, if an employer with 15 or more employees consistently hires relatives of a particular race or gender to the exclusion of non-relatives of other races or the opposite gender. The consequences of nepotism might constitute wrongful termination too. For example, if a boss fires employees solely to create job opportunities for relatives who have the same religious beliefs as does he or she, then the boss might have illegally discharged those employees based on religion discrimination, if their religious beliefs were not the same as his or hers (Nepotism, para. 5-7). Social Issues and Ethically Responsible Management The hiring process requires management to take into account much more than â€Å"good business decisions. It means that those in the supervisory positions need to reflect on the manners in which their decisions affect the other employees, associates, then environment, and society. It is important to keep in mind that most times being socially and ethically responsible, results in more profitable business ventures (Essortment, 2002). When it comes to hiring social issues is one of the main things the manager has to worry about. Everyone always wants the new person to fit into the new work settings. Usually when a new person comes into a workplace in which many of the other employees already know each other and get along very well it is difficult for the new person fit in. It is also the manager’s job to hire someone who he or she thinks will be a good fit for the job as well as a good fit for the other employees. If a person is demanding and has a bad attitude usually they will not get hired because the manager sees through that person and knows that he or she will not benefit the business and feel like an outcast between the other employees. This decision that the manager must face is an ethical decision of the wellness of the business and the wellness of the hiree. As a responsible manager one should always think as well as act ethically. I do not believe that managers should mix business with pleasure. If a manager has befriended some of his or hers employees there is a good chance some social issues will occur. The same goes for the hiring process. As stated above the factor of nepotism is a critical matter within a business if a manager hires his or her friend or relative. If a manager decided to hire a friend or relative him or her that they might feel as if he or she could be in social environments and have nothing to worry about. This is where they are wrong. From personal experience I know many people who have hired a friend and it resulted in not working out. The friend thought that he or she could slack off and not do their part because the manager is his or her â€Å"best friend. † This could cause a huge conflict within the workplace between the employees who have been there for a while and are doing their part, and the manager who hired his or her friend. Socially, it could end up killing the friendship bond between manager and newly hired friend. It also caused madness within the workplace. It is the manager’s ethical responsibility to talk with their friend who is also the newly hired employee to try to work the issues out, or let the friend go before his or her friendship is ruined. Ethically the right thing to do for the business is for the manager to talk to his or her friend to try and let him or her understand that the work that should be getting completed is vital to the success of the business. They should also explain that they could have hired a knowledgeable person who applied, waited his or her turned, and wants to do the work. It is the manager’s ethical responsibility to hire the best people for the job description he or she are looking for. Example of a Workplace Dilemma When I first started working at my current job Massage Envy Spa was going through a difficult time hiring reliable front desk associates. I was working at the spa for just about a month and my manager was in the process of doing three interviews per day. This one girl seemed extremely promising and ready to work as well as be part of our team. When my manager was doing her interview, she decided, it was best that some of the other front desk associates sit in and get a feel for the girl too. Everything went great we all loved the girl so my manager let her go on her way and sent her to get a drug test, which was the last step of her interview process. She had a specific date and time to go to a local clinic that provides drug tests to prospective employees. Unfortunately, this female did not pass her drug test. This put my manager in a very difficult position. This girl obviously did not get the position, however; at that present time it brought legal actions into the situation. Under Massage Envy Spa hiring and employment policy the section about drug testing and failing is a huge deal. With the company is does not just mean you do not get hired; it could also mean trouble with the law for the girl. Whenever a drug test comes back positive law enforcement must now be present. It was a terribly hard decision for my manager to have to do but with the businesses state drug testing laws instead of any type of punishment then girl had to partake in a weeklong rehabilitation treatment seminar. I believe that this decision was the perfect action for the consequences the girl had to face. I am sure she will not be the last to fail a drug test administered for a job position at Massage Envy Spa, but I am sure glad she did not get away with abusing illegal substances. Conclusion Managers have a large amount of work on their plates, the process of hiring being one of the toughest. The best thing for a manager to do is stay true to the overall goodness that a new employee potentially can bring to the business. They must follow all the rules and make sure to be honest and represent the business is a positive way. Most people are willing to do anything for a job they want. The manager must be able to take the hirees personality and drive, and place them metaphorically into the position to see if they are a good fit. A management position is hard work this is why he or she was awarded the position in the first place. The person or persons of higher authority saw that specific employee has the proper ethical standards to manage the business.

Papparizzi Rights Essays - Digital Rights, Human Rights, Privacy Law

Papparizzi Rights Does the Paparazzi threaten First Amendment Rights and Privacy? The question of paparazzi threatening privacy and First Amendment rights is often to situational to argue in a conventional manner, but certainly there are many facets of the issue which can be addressed in a quite straightforward manner. Celebrities who feel they have the right to privacy in public places often muddy the waters of this issue. Oddly enough, those celebrities who have chosen to speak out against what they feel are violations of their privacy most always begin their campaigns with a large press conference. In other words, they gather together those people they wish to not only suppress but also berate in hopes that these people will use their positions and skills to carry these celebrity's messages to the public. Is often seems that theses celebrities want it both ways in that they appreciate coverage when they have a movie, record, or book coming out, but not at any other time. The quandary is that some celebrities can't understand that when one is out in plain view of the public, one cannot reasonably expect privacy. Privacy is a right reserved for when one is in private. The rights of paparazzi journalists must be protected to prevent the slow erosion of the rights of all journalists. If we allow the paparazzi to be used as a scapegoat and to be persecuted and regulated it will not be long until the next most radical fringe group of journalists come under fire. This cycle will eventually lead to the censorship and suppression of all journalists. Paparazzi photographers, just like any photojournalists, finding a fraction of a second which summates a whole news event and capturing it on film. Their print journalist counterparts, who are afforded not only the luxury of editing, but also a few column inches within which to develop their perception of the story fall into a different category all together. A photojournalist must ascertain the defining image of a news event as it is happening and capture it on film. If he or she is doing the job correctly, a reader can get a very good idea of what happened without even reading the accompanying article. There is no luxury of editing in photojournalism, the moment is either captured forever, or it isn't. If a fantastic shot is missed, it is gone forever. A good freelance photojournalist shoots what he or she knows. A good photojournalist also knows what will sell. Some photographs really aren't worth taking from a newsworthiness standpoint, but if a publication is willing to pay enough for them, than they will be taken. Sadly money does rule the world, and until paparazzi photographers can feed their families without having to take these sorts of pictures, they will continue to be taken. It is obvious that one of two things is happening. Either the paparazzi does not threaten privacy and First Amendment rights, or they do in such a way that the public does not care. The reason for this goes back to the rich publications that ultimately drive paparazzi photographers to take these pictures. These publications are supported by advertisers who evidently don't mind being associated with a publication which uses paparazzi photographs, and readers who obviously are wiling to pay to see paparazzi photos. In this way both the corporate and private sectors show their approval for paparazzi work. Photographs lacking malicious intent or not published with gross negligence are not conceivably in violation of the First Amendment if they were taken in what would be considered a public area. Violations of privacy are hard to argue also if the photograph was taken in a public area. Ultimately we do need to protect the rights of the paparazzi as well as their subjects. We need to keep what is public and done in public, public and keep what is done in a private place private, but in those situations. We can not allow our sources of information and news to be restricted Current Events

Free Essays on Ceremonial Speech

Ok, by show of hands how many of you guys have siblings.? Ok, well most of us have siblings and for those who don’t, you’re lucky because you get everything to yourself, but you’re also missing out. Siblings help mold you into who you become, they might do it through teasing or beatings but it’s all out of love. They’re the one’s you have petty arguements with, fight with and even though you always say you’re never gonna speak to them again, that rarely lasts. I have two older brothers and sometimes they can be a huge pain in the neck. They aren’t good for anything much except beating you up, being really overprotective, and downright mean. It was known that if you left anything in the refridgerator it automatically became theirs and there was nothing I could do about it. Once, I remember when I was younger my brother Uteenway, and I got into this huge fight. I think it was over the fact that he tried to stuff me in the sofa bed because he ahd to clean the living room and wanted me to get up. Mind you it’s 8’o clock in the morning, i swear my brothers crazy, but because i didn’t want to wake up, he decided to try to stuff me in the sofa bed and after that day I swore I would never speak to him again. My dad saw this and for our punishment he told us that we couldn’t speak to one another at all, which was fine with us since we were mad at each other, but then it became really hard because we could only talk to our older brother, and when wer would go to school, we would sneak chats when we saw each other and ask how are things going. That experience I think was the hardest thing i’ve had to go through in my life. Because I was the only girl and the youngest, my life was full of torture. They would double team me and take turns beating me up and trying new wrestling moves using me ast their test dummy, and I would tell on them, but they never failed to remind me that my parents wouldnï ¿ ½... Free Essays on Ceremonial Speech Free Essays on Ceremonial Speech Ok, by show of hands how many of you guys have siblings.? Ok, well most of us have siblings and for those who don’t, you’re lucky because you get everything to yourself, but you’re also missing out. Siblings help mold you into who you become, they might do it through teasing or beatings but it’s all out of love. They’re the one’s you have petty arguements with, fight with and even though you always say you’re never gonna speak to them again, that rarely lasts. I have two older brothers and sometimes they can be a huge pain in the neck. They aren’t good for anything much except beating you up, being really overprotective, and downright mean. It was known that if you left anything in the refridgerator it automatically became theirs and there was nothing I could do about it. Once, I remember when I was younger my brother Uteenway, and I got into this huge fight. I think it was over the fact that he tried to stuff me in the sofa bed because he ahd to clean the living room and wanted me to get up. Mind you it’s 8’o clock in the morning, i swear my brothers crazy, but because i didn’t want to wake up, he decided to try to stuff me in the sofa bed and after that day I swore I would never speak to him again. My dad saw this and for our punishment he told us that we couldn’t speak to one another at all, which was fine with us since we were mad at each other, but then it became really hard because we could only talk to our older brother, and when wer would go to school, we would sneak chats when we saw each other and ask how are things going. That experience I think was the hardest thing i’ve had to go through in my life. Because I was the only girl and the youngest, my life was full of torture. They would double team me and take turns beating me up and trying new wrestling moves using me ast their test dummy, and I would tell on them, but they never failed to remind me that my parents wouldnï ¿ ½...

Biography of Chilean President Michelle Bachelet

Biography of Chilean President Michelle Bachelet Known for:  First woman elected as president of Chile; first woman minister of defense in Chile and Latin America Dates:  Born September 29, 1951. Elected president of Chile, January 15, 2006; inauguration March 11, 2006, served until 11 March 2010 (term limited). Elected again in 2013, inauguration March 11, 2014. Occupation:  President of Chile; pediatrician You might also be interested in:  Margaret Thatcher,  Benazir Bhutto,  Isabel Allende About Michelle Bachelet On January 15, 2006, Michelle Bachelet became Chiles first woman president-elect. Bachelet came in first in the December 2005 election but did not manage to win a majority in that race, so she faced a runoff in January against her nearest opponent, a billionaire businessman, Sebastian Pinera. Earlier, she was a minister of defense in Chile, the first woman in Chile or all of Latin America to serve as a minister of defense. Bachelet, a Socialist, is generally considered a center-leftist. While three other women have won presidential elections in the Americas (Janet Jagan of Guyana, Mireya Moscoso of Panama, and Violeta Chamorro of Nicaragua), Bachelet was the first to win a seat without first becoming known through a husbands prominence. (Isabel Peron was her husbands vice-president in Argentina and became president after his death.) Her term in office ended in 2010 because of term limits; she was reelected in 2013 and began serving another term as president in 2014. Background Michelle Bachelet was born in Santiago, Chile, on September 29, 1951. Her fathers background is French; her paternal great-grandfather emigrated to Chile in 1860. Her mother had Greek and Spanish ancestry. Her father, Alberto Bachelet, was an air force brigadier general who died after being tortured for his opposition to Augusto Pinochets regime and support of Salvador Allende. Her mother, an archaeologist, was imprisoned in a torture center with Michelle in 1975 and went into exile with her. In her early years, before her fathers death, the family moved frequently and even lived in the United States briefly when her father worked for the Chilean Embassy. Education and Exile Michelle Bachelet studied medicine from 1970 to 1973 at the University of Chile in Santiago, but her education was interrupted by the military coup of 1973 when Salvador Allendes regime was overthrown. Her father died in custody in March of 1974 after being tortured. The familys funds were cut off.  Michelle Bachelet had worked secretly for the Socialist Youth and was imprisoned by the Pinochet regime in 1975 and held in the torture center at Villa Grimaldi, along with her mother.   From 1975-1979 Michelle Bachelet was in exile with her mother in Australia, where her brother had already moved, and East Germany, where she continued her education as a pediatrician.   Bachelet married  Jorge Dvalos while still in Germany, and they had a son, Sebastin. He, too, was a Chilean who had fled the Pinochet regime. In 1979, the family returned to Chile. Michelle Bachelet completed her medical degree at the University of Chile, graduating in 1982.  She had a daughter, Francisca, in 1984, then separated from her husband about 1986.  Chilean law made divorce difficult, so Bachelet was unable to marry the physician with whom she had her second daughter in 1990. Bachelet  later studied military strategy at Chiles National Academy of Strategy and Policy and at the Inter-American Defense College in the United States.   Government Service Michelle Bachelet became Chiles Minister of Health in 2000, serving under socialist President Ricarco Lagos. She then served as Minister of Defense under Lagos, the first woman in Chile or Latin America to hold such a post. Bachelet and Lagos are part of a four-party coalition, Concertacion de Partidos por la Democracia, in power since Chile restored democracy in 1990. Concertacion has focused on both economic growth and spreading the benefits of that growth throughout segments of society. After her first term as president, 2006 - 2010, Bachelet took a position as the Executive Director of UN Women (2010 - 2013).

The importance of music Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The importance of music - Essay Example I have wanted to learn to play an instrument and had actually taken up piano lessons and guitar lessons but I never quite stuck to it. Nevertheless, without having produced music personally, I continue to love it as a part of my existence. Being part of some school recital where I have to belt out a few short tunes, much to my shame is unavoidable when I was younger. I find nothing wrong in admitting that when I was younger I am a fan of popular music that included boy bands and teen stars. For a while I had been among those die-hard fans that had pictures of singers on their desktop page. Even to this day, I have moments when I enjoy the simple pleasures of listening to One Direction, Katy Perry or Taylor Swift. I actually do have in my play list Story of my Life, Dark Horse, and White Horses, respectively just to name a few. My preference in music is an indication of my diverse personality. I believe that music, like our mood and feelings, changes from day to day and as we grow up. But there will always be artists who will remain with us throughout. When I am having a really good day and I just have that feeling of wanting to dance, I would play something by Zedd like Clarity or Stay the Night, mixing that in with some songs like Levels or Silhouettes by Avicii. I love these songs because though they are house music and are particularly heard on backdrops of clubs and dance parties, listening to the lyrics actually brings out the depth of the songs and the composition actually makes them more interesting.

Construction procurement and legal framework for construction Essay

Construction procurement and legal framework for construction operations - Essay Example It may be either small scale or large scale. For successful completion of the construction project, effective planning is crucial. There are various types of construction: 1. Residential building construction 2. Commercial building construction 3. Industrial building construction 4. Heavy civil construction. The type of construction is the chief determinant of the variety of approach to the procurement of construction services. Construction procurement is absolutely crucial to the delivery of a project on time, budget and high quality. Good procurement is synonymous with the success of the project (Fewings 2013). Suicide bidding relating to a very low bid at a tender age, spending, over budgeting and ex ended time frames may all lead to poor standardization. The loss of knowledge about procurement may cause clients to incur unnecessary additional costs that could be avoided by choosing the right method of procuring. Construction is also prone to other conditions such as weather, labo r availability, finance, topography, ground conditions, and logistics. Selecting the absolute optimal and most effective method is difficult as reliance is more based on past statistical evidence. The clients order the construction that may be for sale or for any other usage. The construction procurement basis include determining the criteria for the project, setting contractual framework, setting tender and selection process, inviting the tenders and awarding a contract. There are key priorities that are maintained, that is, standardization, sustainability, reduced cost of procurement and public accountability (Fewings 2013). Standardization There is a legal framework provided for since the conception of contract formation to its execution. The comparison of the standard of building is outlined in the construction contract law. There are qualities checks of the building process that have to be maintained. This includes efficient completion of the project within an agreed time frame . Execution of a construction project is a team work between the clients. The contractor and the consultant therefore advocate for the three or more parties involved to have mutual agreement on the responsibility and roles of each other for successful completion of the project. Sustainability It applies for both physical positioning of structural connections, structural beams, walls, roofs and foundation. The bilateral symmetry and articulation of the design is greatly considered during construction. Sustainability may also be mental, the willingness of the contractor to complete the project in good timing. Reduced cost of procurement All factors of production are taken into consideration during the procurement process. The main aim is to maximize efficiency and consequently, minimize delay. Public accountability The public does a follow up on the ongoing project. This is essential as the critic is deemed necessary for maximum productivity in a unique and efficient way. Importance o f construction procurement (i) Greater skill of worker The regular repetition of an undertaking by an individual firm makes its performance routine.

The Right to Property Essay Example for Free

The Right to Property Essay Every person in this worls has the right to own a property according to availability of the same. This ownership is founded on his right to live and survive. However, the ownership of a property is subject to certain things that may be out of control of the person. These pertains to the inherent right of the government to act on every matter relating to its subjects. Based on principles and concepts, the ownership of property is very intricate as it involves complicated processes in the political system. Different countries do not have the same rules relating to property rights. As such, one rule may not be applicable to other people. However, no matter how complicated the processes may be, each individual with respect to his morals, nature, needs and other important factors may basically hamper the inherent right of every government to exercise its power. It is true that the government has the power govern the people based on the need of governmental existence, however, these right has its limitations. As every person is also entitled to his right to live a good life, these natural rights actually protect a persons property from any intervention from the government no matter what kind of intervention it may be. Ownership comprises the right to possess, the right to use, the right to manage, the right to the income of the thing, the right to the capital, the right to security, rights or incidents of transmissibility and absence of terms, the prohibition of harmful use, liability to execution, and the incident of residuarity. All these things may simply be understood on the right of every person to enjoy his property, a right to own or possess the same, the right to even destroy it and the right to exclude other people from its use in line with applicable laws. This is in line with the interplay of fact of ownership by a person and the right of the government to subject every person under the rule of law. The right to possess means the right to be put in exclusive control of a thing and enjoy the thing itself according to his will including the right to remain in control. It also include the claim that others should not without permission, interfer the exercise of ownership. The right or liberty to use at ones discretion has rightly been recognized as a cardinal feature of ownership and the fact that, as we shall see, certain limitations also occur. There is a need to follow this limitation in order to make the society harmonious. If we fail to do the same, the use of property without fundamental laws to follow will cause so much trouble in the political system. The right to manage is the right to decide how and by whom the thing owned shall be used. This decision shall rest from the discretion of the owner of the property. As such, he has the right to transfer or let other person use his own property. We should know that ownership has never been absolute. It has been subject to incidents of ownership as the prohibition of harmful use, liability to execution for debt, to taxation and to expropriation under the exercise of the inherent right of the government on eminent domain through public authority. Emphasis on the social aspect of ownership has, however, varied from age to age. Those sacred and inviolable rights, which, according to the Declaration of the Rights of Man, no one could be forced to cede except for public necessity have become, in French law for instance, liable to expropriation on grounds of public utility and subject to a general doctrine forbididng abuse. According to the liberal conception of ownership, there is a sharp distinction between 3 government and ownership. Though, in a loose sense, the said has the right to exercise the power of eminent domain over at least theland comprising its territory, this does not carry with it rights to possess enjoyment or even to alienate it, so that the sense in which the state is owner is very loose indeed. The interest of the state, according to this conception is confined to power of expropriation and a minimum of restrictive regulation, together with the expectancy of acquiring property as legally vacant or by escheat in some instances (Honore 113). This will give us the idea that the state can only hold a property of a person under the exercise of expropriation and other regulations that the government are required to implement. Another concept that is widely related to ownership and use of private property is socialism. Socialism has led to a revised view of the relation between government and ownership, at leat as regards some important types of property, such as land and business. This will mean, pertaining to practice, that the owners privileges of using and powers of managing a thing a she wishes have been curtailed and that the social interest in the productive use of things has been affirmed by legislation. In the negative, this process has meant that, in the interests of health and comfort, many substances cannot be used at all or can only be used in certain ways. For example, the sale of drugs is automatically controlled as it is harmful to the people, only smokeless fuel may be used in certain areas and garden hoses may not be used at certain periods. Such situations multiplied a thousand fold, have come to seem so natural that we hardly realize that the social interest in the use of things, the conservation of resources and in the details of manufacturing processes in a modern, though it is also a primitive, conception. 4 Now, another thing will be added to explain what has been expounded earlier. Positive control by the state shades into prohibition. The positive duty to exploit ones property in a socially beneficial way, as opposed to the prohibition of a harmful exploitation, has not been generally imposed as its implications fully worked out. It has something to do with the prohibition to use properties that may cause nuisance with other people or anyhting that will do bad things against other persons. A different form of state control is exercised by drawing a distinction between different types of ownership. The difference lies, of course, in the right of government officials to interfere in the management of the former categories and in state regulation of income rights deriving from the property, also in differing rules about alienation. In this way, the sphere of operation of ownership in the liberal sense is narrowed and a form of state participation in management substituted in the remaining sphere. These differences may be seen in the actual interplay of the implementation of property laws. Another form of social control consists in the exercise by officials of the management of things in ther private ownership of the state. Such arrangements present the form but not the substance of ownership in the liberal sense. Management and enjoyment are actually divided and political control, directly or indirectly, is exercised over the allocation of resources and the uses to which the thing owned is put. The nationalized industries in the United Kingdom folow this knid of pattern control. The next social control may be exercised by a restriction on the type of thing that is subject to ownership by persons other than the state, a sin the Russian building lease, where the building is owned by a private individual, the land remaining in state ownership. In effect, this restricts the privileges of the building owner in the general interest. 5 For us to understand the details on how government exercise of power was hampered by the natural rights of man to own different kinds of property, we will illustrate it by giving a concrete example. We will view a scenario that was given by Waldron when for instance a person owns a car. When a person owns a car, he has the legal capacity to use it in a certain way (Waldron 27). But it is true only in some circumstances. The owner of the car is not at liberty to drive it on the footpath or to drive it anywhere at a speed faster than seventy m. p. h. There is no liberty to drive it also without a license from the authorities because that would be illegal. The owner of the car has also the right not to let them use car without permission. However, the use of the car should not be a nuisance to his neighbors or should be in a good condition. As such, he may be liable to damages if it rolls into his neighbors fence. We should remember that these rights, liberties and duties are the basic stuff of ownership. But legal relations can be changed. If the person owns a car, he is in a position to change them. He has the power to sell it or give it to somebody else, in which case all the legal relations change. He has to take on the duties and limited rights of a non-owner of the car and someone else take son the rights, liberties, duties and powers of ownership. Or perhaps he lends or hires the car, that invokes a temporary and less extensive change in legal realtions. He can even bequeath the car in his will and testament so that someone else will take over his property rights when he dies. These are his powers to change his leagl situations or relations and that of others if he is the owner of the car. Finally, she may also, in certain circumstances, have his own legal position altered in relation to the car for instance, he is liable to have the car seized in execution of a judgment summons for debt.