Colleges with the Highest Six-Year Graduation Rates

Facts About Snapping Shrimp

Company Profile of Rahimafrooz Bangladesh Ltd” - 1723 Words

Assignment ON â€Å"Company Profile of Rahimafrooz Bangladesh Ltd†. Submitted to: Chowdhury Sifat Kamal Course Instructor of Introduction to Business Department of Business Studies Prepared by: Fuad Mohammad Shah - UG01-22-09-007 Kawsar Ahmed - UG01-24-10-023 Md. Emdadul Hasan Santo - UG01-24-10-001 Bachelor of Business Administration Batch – 24, Section – A STATE UNIVERSITY OF BANGLADESH Date of Submission: 20th April , 2011 [pic] â€Å"Company Profile of Rahimafrooz Bangladesh Ltd.† [pic] Founder Late A.C.Abdur Rahim (1915-1982) Rahimafrooz Bangladesh Limited 01. Background Rahimafrooz Bangladesh Limited was established in 1950A.D. as†¦show more content†¦| |1997 |Attained ISO 9002 certification for RBL operations | |2000 |First India office opened in Ahmedabad | |2001 |Awarded â€Å"Bangladesh Enterprise of the Year† | |2001 |Attained ISO 14001:1996 for RBL operations | |2001 |Launched â€Å"Agora† – the first ever retail chain | |2002 |Launched Rahimafrooz Energy Service promoting distributed power | |2003 |Established Rahimafrooz CNG Ltd. | |2003 |Awarded â€Å"National Export Trophy† | |2004 |Metro net Bangladesh, a fiber optic based digital solution provider forShow MoreRelatedCustomers’ Attitudes Towards Retail Chain Store Services in Bangladesh – a Comparative Study Between Retail Chain Store and Small Retail Store6036 Words   |  25 Pages Customers’ attitudes towards retail chain store services in Bangladesh – A comparative study between retail chain store and small retail store Mohammad Zahedul Alam[1] S.M. Sohel Rana[2] Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyze the customers’ attitudes towards retail chain store services in comparison with the small retail stores in Bangladesh. From the study, it has been found that most of the retail chain stores are selling the quality products with high quality services in the hassleRead MoreA Report on Otobi5847 Words   |  24 Pagesposition of Otobi to its financial success. ââ€" ª Analyze the marketing strategies of the company. ââ€" ª Analyze the effectiveness of the company’s promotional techniques. ââ€" ª Recommend some steps that can assist the company. ââ€" ª Apply the concepts learnt in the business communication course 1.2 Scope The group has chosen Otobi Limited as its choice of company. The furniture industry in Bangladesh can be divided into branded and unbranded furniture. The report is confined to modern, lightweight

Research Memorandum

Question: Describe about the Research Memorandum. Answer: Facts: Catriona Robertson charged with the drug transportation mainly of one of the dangerous drug of methylamphetamine and arrested for the same. Not only this, but she was accused of some other charges as well. The charges include; Dangerous drug trafficking which included mainly methylamphetamine in 200 grams or excess of the said quantity. The accused is a possession of property in question, primarily obtained from the dangerous drug trafficking. The accused kept the connections available that are useful for her purpose of trafficking. The accused even produced the drugs of heroin and methylamphetamine. Under such circumstances, the police surveillance used in the matter for over six months that covertly recorded many conversations of the accused and such details can use for evidence. The evidence coveted by the police includes the particulars of the conversation carried out and also various activities involving the processing of the business in the drug dealing. The police even found lot cash and other accessories related to the drug dealings. Now the main issue that comes here is, if the sentence goes against her, then she might have to spend a long time incarceration and her age is young[1]. At the same time, her crime record is not that gross to not grant bail. Her bail petition was also refused on 19th may, 2016 on the ground of her submission which is unyielding against her in providing the evidence for the matter. The main concern here is to challenge the decision and apply for a fresh bail appeal which is her right under the bails act 1980 (Qld). Issue: With the situation given here, what are the grounds that can deny the bail appeal concerning the circumstances arose against Catriona? What is the evidence that the accused Catriona must show in the court to grant an appeal for the revision of the judicial decision regarding the refusal of bail? Unlike from the above issue, if the accused applies for a fresh bail petition, then what are facts she must produce in the court to grant her bail. What is the best option to put forward after seeing the matters for whether Catriona can appeal or must go for a fresh bail petition? Discussion: At the Bails act[2], under the section of 16, the court holds the power to refuse the grant of bail, if certain conditions not fulfilled from the part of the accused. We will now look further to the act and the clauses under which the court holds the power to grant the bail. Sec 16 (a) explains that there might be a risk in the release of the accused on bail. The statement made under the sec 16 (a), also has two subclauses. Sec 16 (a) (i) claims that the accused may not appear to the court on the release of the bail and also fail to surrender before the forum if released on bail. Sec 16 (a) (ii) (A) explains and claims that the accused may further commit another offence if released on bail. Sec 16 (a) (ii) (B) explains that the life of the claimed victim might fall under the danger since that individual might be the defendant against the accused and also might risk other persons safety welfare. Sec 16 (a) (ii) (C) explains that if the accused s released on bail[3], then there might be interference on the part of the witness who prepared against the accused to come to court. The act of the accused may further obstruct the going process of the court with the justice and that may get delayed. Any other person related to the matter acting against the accused can also come in under the hindrance and the freedom to live ay get violated. Sec 16 (b) explains that sometimes the bail not granted on the ground that it is of the defendant's or the accuser's risk because if they are released on bail, then they fall into prey of violence. Sec 16 (1A) of the Act explains that the insufficient amount of the information against the defendant that is needed to decide the matter whether to grant the bail or not, then the court holds the power to restrict the bail on such grounds. Under the subclause of 1, it is defined that if there is less time regarding the decision of the matter to be carried out, then the court denies the bail upon special grounds. Clause 2 of the subsection 1(a) explains that the court or the police are to record all the incidents regarding the defendant before arresting and after kept in the custody. All the recorded incidents will take into account while the grant of bail to be approved from the part of the court. The records of the incidents include the following: Sec 16 (1A) (2) (a)- explains that the nature of the incident and how serious is it impact are prior in the record. Sec 16 (1A) (2) (b)- background of the accused or the defendant and also the environment and the personal character must be on the record. Sec 16 (1A) (2) (c)- the records and history of the previous appeals and grants of the bail and also any past record of offence with the ground for grant of bail. Sec 16 (1A) (2) (d) - the evidential strength of the defendant also all the evidence gathered against and for the respondent to be produced before the court when the bail petition prayed. Sec 16 (1A) (2) (e) (i)- explains that even the relationship f the defendant with the community will also put under while the appeal made for bail. (ii) Explains that the cultural considerations if any and also in (iii) any considerations and the services where the defendant participated and all the records that the court needs during the time of grant of bail. Sec 16 (3) of the Act explains that the court has the right to restrict the bail on the ground if the defendant found to be committing nay nuisance after the grant of the bail in the previous hearing. The description for subclause (b) explains, if the offence did concerning the section of 13[4] under the act, then the restriction over the grant of bail called by the court against the defendant. The subclause (c) explains that the bail will be restricted to the defendant if found to be using any dangerous weapon[5] against the victim or even threatened to have used one then upon such grounds the bail not granted. Subclause (d) specifies all the acts done by the defendant that goes against the act then the grant of the bail may be restricted. The meaning of the statement includes all the offences done against the section of 33(3) with the charges prescribe under sec 33(6). Subclause (e) explains that the action against the sec of 24 and 38 under the Criminal Organisation Act, 2009[6] a re non-bailable in nature. Subclause (f) says about the offences done with the charges against the sec of 359[7] with the aggrieved circumstances concerning the act of Criminal Code[8]. In all the circumstances the court or the police hold the right unless the defendant can prove that detention not justified from the part of the forum. Subsection (3A) of the section of 16 under the Bail's Act[9] explains that the bail petition can get rejected, if the defendant found to be a member of the criminal and has involved in such activities, then the court or the police hold the right to reject the bail petition. Applying the rules to the given matter of Catriona we can find that the accused here have enough grounds to challenge the decision of the judicial division. Eligibility for bail: While taking the reference from the section of 16(3) to grant the bail[10], we find that Catriona falls under the section where the decision can be challenged. The statement made on the basis that most of the jurisdictions in Australia[11] have the right to grant the bail and also make the presumption for the favour of granting bail. In the Australia itself, there are two jurisdictions[12] of the grant of bail. The presumption of the bail based on the combination of the both laws depends on upon the detention of the defendants detain the custody and also the measure of the offence done as stated under the bail act. If there are minor crimes, then the bail granted in one attempt but for some matters the grant becomes complicated. As discussed in the issue of kuczborski v the state of queensland[13], the grant of the bail is a mandatory in regards to the offence and it is to make clear prosecution and the outcome must be an active case for the rejection of the bail. In the petty sessions of the court, the grant of bail involves the combination of the right and the presumption as stated in the pg 74 of 3741 of the act. The major matters like the murders are only decided by the Supreme Court whether the grant of bail can be justified or not. The matter of Catriona for the appeal of bail decided at the Queensland Supreme Court[14] on the grounds held under sec 16(3). Under the section of 16(3), there is a clear mention that the bail cannot grant under the offence committed with or without the grant of bail. In this context, we must note the point, which the court did not allow Catriona to produce any pieces of evidence from the defence. Not only that even the charges made by the police did not arrive at the defence against Catriona. Hence, we see that the bail was refused on the ground of the assumption of the weight of the offences and no evidence was produced for or against her. Even there were no relevant charges that can be applied with the reference of sec 16 (3) of the act then also, the Judge Quant J brought some serious issue and assumption of the risks related if there was a grant of bail. The situations occurred in the matter of Catriona along with following the rules under the Bails Act, the remedy advisable to Catriona to revise the decision of the judicial division. Along with that Catriona must also produce the shreds of evidence that shows off her previous criminal record if any and then the grant of the bail can depend on upon such references produced by her. The counsel of Catriona must also highlight the fact with which the decision was passed while challenging the same. Also, the challenge must include that Catriona will not spread any danger to the normal society after the grant of bail and she will be present during the prosecution. The date is a long time gap from the date the bail issued so the court must allow the bail under the consideration fact, R v. Light[15]. Another matter of the Burton v. R[16] also explains about the bail in consideration. Conclusion: It is the prima facie right[17] of Catriona to attain a bail under the bail's act R v. Fisher[18]. Various courts adopted the decision regarding this case in deciding the grant of bail under the unusual circumstances and the presumed matters. The prima facie fact also includes the liberty of the accused to plead for grant of bail. Based on the decision of the various courts, the rejection of the bail from the part of Catriona seems to have been done under some ideal conditions. While going through the matter for her, it is always possible to apply for the revision of the bail decision passed by her honour. In the reference to the sec 16 (3), if the bail moved in that manner then there is scope for the revision as the claimed accuse seems to be missing from her matter so as not to grant the petition for bail. Hence, in the given situation, the best route is to go for the revision of the decision with the surrender of documents specially the passport. Bibliography: A, Robinson and Bartkowiak Thron, "Policing Youth Curfews" [2014] The'Wee Willie Winkie'model of enforcing bail conditions. An Application For Bail (2016) www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au Applying For Bail | Your Rights, Crime And The Law | Queensland Government (2016) Qld.gov.au Bail - Queensland Courts (2016) Courts.qld.gov.au Criminal Code Act 1899 (2016).053.pdf High Court Of Australia (2016). High Court Upholds Validity Of QueenslandS Criminal Organisation Act 2009 - Crown Law (2016) Crownlaw.qld.gov.aue Social Democacy.

Raisin in the Sun A Tale of Dreams Essay Example

Raisin in the Sun: A Tale of Dreams Essay The play Raisin in the Sun is a tale of a family that has different dreams, encouraged by the insurance check from their deceased fathers policy. The family is split on how to spend the money. However, Mama, in the end, gets her way to get the entire family to a bigger house that will give them a platform to stabilize their lives. In the play, the personalities of Walter, Lena (Mama) and Beneatha Younger conflict due to their different characteristics and outlook on life. Walter has dreams of schemes that he conjures with his friends hoping to strike it rich. Walter believes in a quick solution to the problems facing the family. Mama, on the other hand, is more reflective. She desires to fulfill the dream she shared with her deceased husband. A house would be for the family. Mama believes a bigger house will allow the family room to venture out and explore opportunities knowing they always have somewhere to go back to. Beneatha Younger, on the other hand, is privileged to have attain ed higher education in the family and sometimes is overbearing for perceiving herself as an intellectual; more than anyone else in the family. Walter, Beneatha, and Mama have their dreams deferred or altered in Raisin in the Sun, indicating the unpredictability of life and its need for determination and persistence. Walter Younger is determined to be the new head of the family. He is preoccupied with schemes that will guarantee the family financial success he is particularly fascinated by ideas that are high-income generators in the short term. Walter feels that wealth is his escape from a dead end job and feelings of hopelessness and desperation (Hansberry 12). However, his dream is altered when after being entrusted by his mother with the rest of the money, he loses it all to a prospective business partner. To Walter, the entire sum invested in a liquor store would return in a high return on investments. Walter does not agree with his mother on the priorities of the family. Every coin that was not spent on the liquor store investment was a waste according to Walter (Hansberry 18). Mama is open and honest in communication and her dealings. On the other hand, Walter is secretive and prone to making impulsive decisions. Walter makes his mother feel guilty for using the money to pursue her dream. He secretly uses the money to continue his dream. Walters dream is deferred when the prospective partner goes into hiding with the capital. We will write a custom essay sample on Raisin in the Sun: A Tale of Dreams specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Raisin in the Sun: A Tale of Dreams specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Raisin in the Sun: A Tale of Dreams specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Mama is a reflective woman who dreams of getting a house for the entire family to settle in. Mamas dream was shared with her late husband. However, unlike her son Walter, she is not impulsive. She takes her time before making decisions. She took her time to find the seemingly perfect house. Her dream is under threat from the dreams of other family members except for Ruth (Walters wife) who supports her. Mama is a traditional woman typical of women her age in the times the story is set. She prefers getting the family a home away from the ghetto they live in. Her sons dreams conflict with hers. Firstly, she is against the sale of liquor from an ethical and health standpoint. Secondly, does not see the world as Walter does. She does not believe in the get rich quick scheme that Walter believes in.; Her dream comes true partially because the family moves into a good house although the residents of the neighborhood object to their presence and try to bribe them to get away.; Beneatha;s dream, on the other hand, is influenced by her personality. Beneatha is self-serving to a great extent, and this is where her dream differs from Mamas and Walterss. WEhile Walter and Mama are focused on actions that will benefit the entire family; Beneatha;s vision of the money is entirely directed towards serving herself. Beneatha wants the money to be used to fund her education so she can be a doctor, an achievement that will allow her to express herself (Hansberry 12). Beneatha;s values are self-oriented and have no visions of the family. She wants to be an independent woman who does not rely on a man for sustenance. Beneatha;s dream involves a career that is alongside a pursuit of identity and feminist connotations. Beneatha even tells Ruth and Mama that she might decide not to get married. The man in her life (George Murchison) is too ;shallow; for her. He does not have an awareness of cultural issues, especially race relations. Ruth and Mama are shocked because it is unlike the societal expectation of women at the time. Walter, Beneatha, and Mama have different dreams. Walter wants to get rich quickly and life the family from poverty. Mama wants the family to have a modest home in a safe neighborhood. Beneatha, on the other hand, wants to be a doctor and find her identity. Walter, Beneatha, and Mama have different priorities with the money and how it contributes to their dreams. While Walter and Mama desire to assist the entire family with the money, Beneatha is focused on using the money to advance her career. Walter and Mama, however, differ on what will assist the family most. Walter believes in investing in business, while Mama wants a home for everyone. Walter has his dream deferred, while Mama realizes her dream. Beneatha, on the other hand, has to wait to see the outcome of her dream. Works Cited Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun: A Drama in Three Acts. Random House, 1959.

Cause and effects essays

Cause and effects essays The debate on Neanderthal man's place in human evolution has continued unabated since the discovery of the first Neanderthal fossil in 1856. One camp believes Neanderthal man is a human ancestor and should be classified as a subspecies of modern man-Homo sapiens Neanderthals. The opposition argues that Neanderthal man is a distinct species, homo Neanderthals, entirely separate from modern humans. This paper seeks to prove that Neanderthal man is indeed related to modern humans by looking at key elements of Neanderthal physiology, behavior, and culture. Recent findings on the mitochondrial DNA taken from the right humerus of a Neanderthal skeleton failed to show significant similarities with the mitochondrial DNA of modern humans. According to the study, one sequence of Neanderthal DNA shows significant variances from the same sequence in moderns. From this, researchers concluded that Neanderthals diverged about 600,000 years ago to form homo Neanderthals, a genetic line separate from that of the modern homo sapiens. The study, however, was based solely on DNA from one Neanderthal individual because the genetic material is scarce and difficult to extract. One individuals DNA may be an inadequate indicator of the genetic variability within an entire species. (Shipman, 2002) Until more Neanderthal genetic material becomes available, fossil evidence remains the best source of study for on Neanderthal mans physiology and culture. Neanderthals shared key physical characteristics with modern humans. They both have the same skeletal structures. Their brains were roughly the same size in relation to their bodies. Based on their joint structures and cranial capacities, anthropologists believe that Neanderthals were capable of doing many activities that modern humans could do. (Trinkaus and Shipman, p. 412) Proponents of the homo neandertalis argue that Neanderthal bones were much t ...

Immigration in America Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Immigration in America - Research Paper Example This stark increase in immigration quantities poses a variety of problems in the United States, including economic issues, concerns associated with law enforcement, wages provided to native citizens, and even problems with drugs and criminal behavior. VOLUME OF IMMIGRANTS IN THE COUNTRY According to a 2006 report, there were over 10 million illegal immigrants living in the United States (Kane and Johnson 2). By March of 2011, this number was estimated to be at 11.1 million (Passel and Cohn 1). The volume of immigrants currently residing in the country is representative of approximately 3.1 percent of the total American population, including native citizens. PROBLEMS WITH MEDICAID PAYMENTS Having established volume of immigrants entering and currently living in the U.S., it is important to identify the plethora of problems associated with illegal entry into the country. One of the main problems is the burden placed on state-level and federal-level governance related to economics. An a dministrator of the National Policy Institute identifies that illegal immigrants put a significant burden on the Medicaid system, a government-funded health care program designed to ensure that native citizens living below the poverty level maintain access to affordable health care. In 2005, it was estimated that state budgets would be burdened with a 12.1 percent increase in total Medicaid costs, with an expectation that costs would double every six years. This has significant ramifications for state-level budgets, in today’s society, many of which are already fraught with large-scale budgetary problems. It is estimated that 21.8 percent of all immigrant households are receiving Medicaid assistance (Rubenstein 9). This is a substantial problem as many illegal immigrants have children while living within the borders of the United States, therefore automatically making their children legitimate U.S. citizens. This makes the child, and the household caregivers, eligible for Med icaid when their incomes fall below poverty level. Currently, the federal government is concerned about long-term sustainability of Medicaid reimbursements during a period of economic decline stemming from a variety of different factors including decreased taxation revenues and over-spending at the Federal level. CONCERNS OVER WAGES FOR NATIVE CITIZENS In the United States, there is a very large segment of the native population that maintains low-level job skills and do not have the benefits of holding a college degree to improve their standard of living that is dictated with higher wage provision. Because of this, they are forced to take low paying jobs in a variety of sectors, with a majority in the service sector. When illegal immigrants enter the United States, employers have significant incentives to hire these aliens since they can provide them with very low-paying jobs without having to provide legally-mandated supplementary benefits such as business-sponsored insurance. It b ecomes more advantageous for businesses to choose illegal immigrants over low-skilled native citizens since native workers are entitled to certain benefit packages. A whopping 20 percent of all workers in service, construction and manufacturing production are immigrants (Gans 2). The demographic that is most significantly impacted by increases in immigration is the low-skilled black worker in the United State